Becoming Illiterate
Literacy
in today’s society can be explained as a two edged sword. On one hand we all
need to be able to read and write, and on the other we all in some way need to
be “literate” with technology. As a child growing up technology was for
entertainment, but not for daily life, so you didn’t have to know how to use it
as frequently. Your parents could cut you off from the everyday world by
sending you to your room, and they controlled most everything you were exposed
to because technology was not so prevalent. Technology
grows and evolves at such an astounding rate its hard for anyone that doesn’t
use it on a daily basis to keep up with it at all.
Knowing
how to read and write is a tangible skill set that everyone needs in the world
today. Jonathan Kozol explains this in his essay “The Human Cost of an
Illiterate Society”, when he starts off with a simple set of instructions on
how to use a common household chemical. To those of us that can read it may not
seem like much, but to an illiterate person it’s a different language. The main
idea to this essay is that an illiterate person cannot function as an effective
part of our society. He gives many close to home type examples of an illiterate
person’s day-to-day life: one of a man with a broken down car on the side of
the road that can call the police for help, but can’t tell them where to find
him so they can come help him, another is about a woman whose child needs help
with her homework in a reading class, but she cannot help the child because she
can’t read. When children know more about technology than parents do there will
be little that a parent actually do to protect the child or to govern what the
child experiences. Now take these examples and think what it would be like if
you couldn’t read. Would you be able to enjoy the internet? Facebook?
The
other part of being able to read and write is being able to apply it everyday
in society. Using technology is a good example of the tangible side of this
skill set. With technology evolving so quickly parents need to be able to
assess what their children expose themselves to. This is a problem with today’s
parents slowly becoming Technologicly illiterate. Parents are progressively
becoming unable to keep up with their children’s learning curve with
technology. Gadgets, computers, game consoles, phones and other paraphernalia
are all compromising today’s parents’ ability to parent.
A
parents’ ability to control what a child is exposed to is a way to protect a
child from parts of the world until they are strong enough to learn about it on
their own. In bell hooks’ book: “Learning in the Shadow of Race and Class” She
explains how she grew up in a family that wasn’t “poor” but that didn’t have
much left over for luxury items after all seven children and parents were provided
the necessary things in life. The way she was brought up has actually made her
a loner and that makes it somewhat easier for her to keep track with school and
not worry so much about “who would pay for pizza and drinks in the world
outside.” She speaks of modesty in
the way she was raised and how children around her acted during high school and
how much that differed to university.
When she decided to attend Stanford in California her parents refused to
give her permission which reminded her of all the other desires she told
herself would never get fulfilled. This fueled her desire even more to attend a
“good” school, a school “built by a man who believed in hard work,” a place to
learn. At Stanford she had been looked at as a pitied little black girl that
wanted to be like the privileged.
During her years at Stanford she learned how much the privileged class
actually hated and feared the working class. She found herself alienated from
everyone in the school; even the other black students that she actually thought
would understand her situation. Because of her beliefs and steadfast attitude
bell hooks never attended her own graduation ceremonies, not because she had
been scared, but because to have degrees from schools where she was treated so
badly on the basis of race, class and sex did not make her proud. hooks’
parents were able to shield her from most of the bad parts of the world until
she was strong enough to learn about them on her own. Parents back in that day
and age didn’t need to be concerned with technology, but they did worry about
racism and drugs. During the time period covered by hooks culturally literate
parents influenced their child’s lives by being involved in it. They didn’t
need to worry about what type of music their child was listening to or who they
were idolizing because they could control all of it with some effort.
With
technology constantly bombarding people with choices and with anonymity anyone
can do anything with technology without fear of being judged. Other countries are
dealing with this as well, its not just America. In Todd Gitlin’s book: “Media
Unlimited: How the Torrent of Images and Sounds Overwhelms Our Lives”, he
explains that “Hollywood is the global cultural capital” because it is the
majority of influence seen by the rest of the world. Even when some parts of
the world hate America, you will still see them drinking Coke-Cola, and wearing
Levi jeans, this just goes to show you another example of how America
influences almost everyone in the world in some way. Another example he gives
it the very remote tribe of Tungusians that usually are known for their
bearskin rituals but have been seen wearing reversed baseball caps. He explains
why in a world of differences that American media can transcend the boundaries
of country, language, beliefs, race, sex and class. The supply and demand model sufficiently explained in detail
about how American images and sounds are not forced on anyone but wanted by
everyone because they are viewed as fun and exciting. The demand side being
explained in terms that American pop culture is not popular because of
availability, but because it is a polyglot of different styles and adapts with
time and influence that attracts so many more people to it. This explains why
everyone wants that new gadget or to be part of that new social networking
site. Demand fuels the desires of so many and forces parents to have to learn
about their children’s technology. When they take a break from learning they
fall farther and farther behind and eventually will become “illiterate” in
today’s society and not be able to parent as effectively as the parents in the
past that didn’t have to learn about technology.
Today’s
parents have to fight with movie stars, pop icons, ever changing gaming
systems, clothing lines, and the envy of their entire families just to keep in
the game of parenting. The whole dynamic of parenting has evolved tremendously
in the last 15 years. Can you imagine what parts of our culture will push more
parents towards “illiteracy” in the future? Continuing to persue literacy in
our society will always drive parents to learn about their children’s lives.
They will need to do this to better protect and teach their children to make
healthy decisions, without creating a young adult that can’t function on their
own.
1 comment:
Good word choice, excellent opening paragraph and great conclusion.
in the fifth paragraph you didn't say much about supply and careful not to use quotes like in the second paragraph; also, maybe a little more clarity with expressing your opinion. Who is to blame for cultural illiteracy?
Post a Comment